If your ADSL2+ service isn't working well for you, if you're not sure if it's working as fast as it can, or if you just want to see whether you can make your service work a bit quicker - read on!
When ADSL2+ services are configured to run as fast as the line can support, various factors become important in ensuring that your service runs as fast and as reliably as possible. These are factors that don't typically matter as much (or at all) at lower, fixed, speeds.
As a result, an ADSL service that worked fine at lower, fixed speeds can become unreliable, or can demonstrate significant packet loss or dropout rates, when it is transitioned to a 'full rate' (or 'best effort') ADSL2+ service.
An analogy here can be drawn to a motorcycle rider, hammering along a windy road on the edge of a cliff. The faster she rides, the greater the chance of slipping over the crash barrier and… crashing.
This leads to the single best way to reduce packet loss and dropouts on an ADSL2+ service, which is to just… slow it down a little. This can take the reliability of such a service from marginal up to 'rock solid'. It's a non-linear improvement that is, again, comparable to that motorcycle rider and the merits of backing off 'just a tad' versus the maximum possible speed on the current road.
Conversely, its also possible that your line may be configured at present with performance parameters that are at the other end of the scale - that are too conservative, and in that case, your line may be quite capable of being run at far higher speeds with no loss of stability.
These issues might be compared to the process of dealing with the bumps in the road that motorcyclist is riding on. Smooth out those bumps and the ride gets faster, without becoming less stable - and after improving those things, the speed can often be cranked up still further manually to boot.
A full-rate ADSL2+ service does the best it can with the current line conditions that you present to it. If your line conditions change, your speed will change too.
Sometimes lines get worse (literally, with age) - in a manner that cannot be directly 'fixed'. Sometimes, the factor influencing speed can be addressed.
It's a chain that is only as strong as its weakest link - and (as we'll see!) there are a lot of links in that chain that can have an influence on the outcome.
Let's start out with an upper bound for the performance you might expect from an ADSL2+ service. You can see a graph that provides a sense of the performance curve concerned, here:

It's important to be clear on what this graph is and what it is not.
It is an indication of the maximum theoretically possible performance for a given line attenuation/distance from your local exchange.
It does not guarantee anything about the speed on your particular line. What it represents is an upper bound - not an average, not a lower bound, and not a promise. In essence, you should expect your performance not to exceed this level (though in some exceptional circumstances it might).
Over time, achieved performance in the real world can gradually reduce due to various factors, such as the presence of other ADSL services in the same cable bundle as your own causing 'cross pair interference', and the progressive degradation of the wiring (and more often, the wiring joints) in the copper line running back to your exchange.
These are often things you can't do anything to improve.
Also, achieved performance can 'suddenly' change too, due to factors (such as those listed below) which can cause a step change in the quality of the end to end chain of electronics and cabling that makes your high speed ADSL2+ service possible.
These are often things that you can do something to improve.
This might sound elementary, but some routers are running software and hardware that is less than perfect and that can develop some forms of 'bit rot' after running for a long time.
In addition, over the course of a long held 'full rate' connection, short term bursts interference and other similar factors can lead to some router chipsets progressively disabling 'buckets' (64k chunks of overall link capacity) in the connection. This can lead to your connection getting progressively slower in small increments over time. Depending on the router, chipset, firmware, and what caused the buckets to be disabled in the first place, those chunks of disabled line capacity don't necessarily come back again once the line interference passes.
Power cycling your router (turning it off, waiting a few minutes, and turning it on again) can sometimes do a world of good.
In a perfect world you wouldn't need to do that. But here in the real world, it's really the very first thing to try.
It also makes sure that your router hardware is clear about who is in charge in the relationship!
Different ADSL2+ routers perform differently under various real world line conditions, due to having different 'chip-sets' that implement ADSL2+ and to having different software 'tuning' of how the ADSL2+ chip-sets are used.
If you feel that your current ADSL2+ performance isn't consistent with your line length and/or expectations (and providing it isn't your expectations at fault), you may see better performance with another brand of ADSL2+ router.
Unfortunately, sometimes routers can become faulty with unpredictable consequences. We have seen routers 'half' failing at times, in a manner that means they still connect, but at lower speed and with frequent dropouts.
When a line is not performing according to expectations, and if you are using a very cheap router - consider borrowing or buying a better one to see what difference that makes.
At the worst, this sort of changeover test eliminates your router from consideration as a potential problem source.
This is very valuable diagnostically. It may help! Even if it does not, trying another router is diagnostically very valuable in eliminating this potential source of performance issues.
Symptoms include unstable operation, or failure to automatically recover from a temporary loss of connection. If the router needs power cycling to recover from a line 'dropout', the router may have a firmware bug.
You should upgrade your firmware to a newer/better version, and/or consider changing brands of device entirely if this problem persists.
Some routers get hot, and can then become unstable (so they drop connections, so they have trouble connecting, or so they start running slowly or erratically).
Other than replacing them with better routers, a workaround for 'hot routers' that has been seen to work by some is to run these routers on their side. This seems to help with heat dissipation from the box for some models of router with such issues. Of course, moving the router away from other hot electronic items to a relatively cool place will also help.
It is worth ensuring that your router actually supports ADSL2+ and that it is connected in ADSL2+ mode if you wish it to do so.
Check the router status screens in the web interface of your router to make sure.
You may find that you can move to a higher performance ADSL2+ profile and get a faster, but still stable, connection. Of course if you find the connection is not stable, simply move back to a more stable profile. In the end, for almost everyone, stability actually matters far more than absolute speed.
To do this, Internode provides a variety of line profiles that you can select on an Internode DSLAM port. This is available on Easy Broadband and Easy Naked (as well as the old Extreme and NakedExtreme services) that are delivered via an Internode DSLAM port. These can be viewed and configured online by logging in to 'My Internode' and then selecting the profile changer. Further information is available on this page.
It is also possible to request the moving of your service to a 'stability' profile on other ADSL2+ service types offered by Internode - though this must be done by a support request to the Internode helpdesk.
Line profiles represent a spectrum of alternatives that you can think of as points along a line:
Currently, new Internode ADSL2+ services via the Internode DSLAM network are configured with an initial line profile somewhere in the middle, but toward the 'stability' end of the spectrum.
This 'ADSL2+ Initial' profile includes a nominal downstream data rate limit of 8 megabits per second. That's really quite fast - but not as fast as ADSL2+ can potentially provide. Limiting this speed maximum in this way creates a very much larger margin for errors and line noise (SNR) than running 'flat out' does. It further increases stability against line faults and line noise as a result.
The aim is to ensure that our customers have a stable connection if they are unaware of the various factors in this post, and if they have not yet considered the implementation of the many steps possible (as listed here) to potentially improve that situation.
You are very welcome to try, and you are encouraged to try, various different line profiles to see how they perform on your line.
In doing so, you can find the one that, right now, represents the highest speed you can obtain while still keeping an acceptable level of connection stability (i.e. the best trade-off between speed and stability for your current circumstances).
Once you have run through the rest of the items in this checklist, and have improved your line conditions as a result, you may find that you can then come back and 'crank up the speed' somewhat more on your line by selecting a profile further toward the 'speed' end of the spectrum of choices provided to you.
This one sounds counter-intuitive, but if your achieved ADSL2+ speed is in the 4-6 megabit per second range, you may achieve a higher speed using the ADSL1 protocol. Try locking your modem into ADSL1 mode; or using the Internode profile changer to lock the DSLAM port into full-rate ADSL1 mode - both achieve the same outcome.
We observe that this can often provide higher speeds for some customers than ADSL2+ can, and can sometimes cure drop-out problems that are present in ADSL2+ mode as well.
There are sensible reasons for this, based on ADSL1 being a fixed power protocol, and ADSL2+ being variable power based on line conditions. In this intermediate speed realm, ADSL2+ can have a tendency to be 'too nice' compared to neighbouring ADSL1 services in the same cable bundle, by not using quite enough output power to be heard over the worst case line noise.
There are all sorts of potential wiring faults in your premises—especially if the building is an old one.
This can include the presence of 'un-terminated' sockets, the use of old and/or rubbish cabling in your roof space, and the presence of partial or total short circuits (which can be caused by things such as a cable being trapped into a corner and stretched, or otherwise subject to shearing or crushing forces by being caught in some physical thing that has moved down onto the cable).
For example a 'Bridge Tap' is simply a length of phone cable that is patched into your line via a 'T-junction' and ends in an un-terminated socket (a socket with nothing in it), or simply snakes around the roof a bit before just 'ending' up there. Depending on the length of the tap, this can cause a specific frequency in your line to stop being usable by ADSL.
A central splitter (on line-shared services) and/or having your wiring physically checked by a licensed cabler (all ADSL services including Naked ADSL) is the single best thing you can consider to both performance optimise your service today, and to insulate it against a number of forms of cabling fault that may develop later.
This is usually the most effective single thing you can do - it won't make things worse, it will eliminate this (single most common) cause of problems, and it almost always helps to some extent.
In some cases, this work can raise the speed dramatically. This is because having one installed results in a new, clean, wiring path from the incoming connection in the street to your ADSL2+ router, bypassing any bad wiring or incorrect filtering in your premises.
In the case of customers using Naked DSL services (where no splitters are needed at all), having a licensed cabler run a new cable to your ADSL router and physically disconnecting all other cabling in the house from that incoming line is the equivalent thing to do.
Doing this has the same potential for (sometimes dramatic) performance improvement if you have old, corroded, or complicated wiring in your premises.
And once you've done this, you don't need in-line filters in the rest of your house any more - making your life simpler (and more flexible) in terms of your use of that phone line for ADSL and non-ADSL devices. Additionally we have observed that most central filters are built to a higher standard than in-line filters - they are notably less likely to fail and need replacement.
Further information is available on this page.
Unless you've actioned the previous step (to eliminate this issue entirely), it is important that you properly filter all non-ADSL devices.
That literally means anything at all on the line that is not your ADSL router. Every other device, regardless of what it is, needs an inline filter (unless you have centrally split/filtered your premises as above).
That includes phones, fax machines, FOXTEL box phone line connections, alarm systems, answering machines, extension bells, EFTPOS devices and TTY systems. Whatever and wherever they are attached, if it isn't an ADSL modem/router and it connects to a telephone socket, it needs a filter.
If you have more than three such devices attached along with your ADSL router, you will find that you are likely to suffer ADSL performance problems and dropouts, and that Central Splitter really is the way to go. That removes all device-count limits from the line as well as removing the need for separate in-line filters at all.
Common symptoms of un-filtered devices on your line (beware, especially, things like old monitored alarm systems, even if they are switched off) are that the ADSL service drops out when there is an incoming phone call and/or when an outgoing phone call is made, and the presence of audible electronic 'hash' (noise) on the line when you make a voice phone call.
Sometimes there can be devices in your premises that require filters, but which you don't know to be connected (old alarm systems, FOXTEL boxes installed by someone who failed to add a filter, etc).
Again, having a central splitter professionally installed (for ADSL along with a voice line service), or simply having your wiring checked (both line shared and naked services) by a licensed cabler can make a huge positive difference.
If you have not, or can't, or don't want to, install a central splitter or have your wiring professionally checked, and if you have no more than three such non-ADSL devices, you should also check your inline filters are good ones.
Many older filters are not actually rated to work properly with ADSL2+ and their presence substantially reduces performance or tends to lead to frequent drop-outs.
And some cheap filters are just ... cheap.
If you're not sure, either replace them or perform an isolation test (see below) to compare the difference. They don't cost a lot compared to the frustration that not replacing them can cause, if they are not up to specification.
An isolation test simply involves disconnecting all non-ADSL devices from your phone line to see whether the ADSL service gets faster (or stops dropping out). If it does, then something you unplugged is the source of that reduced speed and/or dropouts.
If you do see such an improvement, progressively re-connecting other devices will help to you find the source of some (or all) of your reduced performance.
Every device you re-connect (up to a maximum of three) also needs to have an ADSL2+ certified line filter in the line. Alternatively a central splitter does this splitting job just once at the ingress point in your premises and you do not then need (and should not then use) line filters on any individual devices. And you no longer have a limit of three other devices that you may attach.
A monitored alarm on the same line creates special challenges beyond just the use of simple in-line filters.
Such an alarm (whether switched on or not) will have an adverse impact on ADSL performance unless it is properly wired in by a licensed professional cabler.
The best approach is to either have the alarm professionally re-wired into the house line wiring by a licensed cabler who can install the appropriate filtering, or to remove that line connection and move to the use of an alarm that links back to the central monitoring centre using either a connection over your Internet link, or a connection via a mobile phone network modem. These alternatives are now widely available.
Some models of telephone (most infamously, the Telstra Touchfone T200) draw bursts of power from the phone line at intervals, to recharge an internal capacitor that in turn powers the circuit that 'remembers' your speed-dial numbers.
Each time the T200 pulls a pulse of power, this can cause an ADSL dropout. The only guaranteed solution is to redeploy any such phones as doorstops.
Make sure your physical connections are tight - that you don't have a loose phone plug or socket. A loose, dirty or corroded connection between two cables, or in a wall socket or router socket, can have a huge negative impact on performance and stability.
Similarly, a long phone extension cord can have a large negative influence as well. Eliminate all excess cable length that you can, check your connectors, and ideally move your router very close to your incoming connection and use either Ethernet cable or Wi-Fi to then connect onward to your computers, rather than running a long internal phone extension cable or (worse) multiple connections with joiners in series.
The incoming ADSL2+ signal is highly sensitive to electronic impulse noise and to cross pair interference.
Use the shortest cabling you can, and try to avoid having the cabling cross over power cables any more frequently than is absolutely necessary. Try to avoid the presence of coiled up phone cabling as well, as this can increase the influence of external noise sources.
Speeds can be impacted by such factors to a surprising extent (sometimes up to multiple megabits per second), especially on lines operating at high speed (20 megabits per second or more). Simply moving your patch cable further away from power cables can be the cheapest performance improvement you've ever made.
We have seen several instances of external attached hard drives or other electronic devices on the same power circuit as an ADSL router that cause ADSL router instability (via voltage drops or the transmission of electromagnetic interference into the router via the power circuit path, or even via the phone line path).
Devices that rely upon large magnets to drive them (the most common problem is speakers) can also as have an impact on the electrical signals and should be placed to avoid your ADSL router.
An isolation test involving the disconnection of all non-essential electronics can help to determine whether this is a factor in your installation.
Auto sensing of speed and duplex of Ethernet cabling is built into most Ethernet switch ports and computer Ethernet ports these days, and most people find that it 'just works'.
However, a specific common failure mode can be a decision to lock down a specific speed (10 or 100 or 1000) or a specific duplex setting (half or full) on an Ethernet port, without configuring the device on the other end of the same cable to exactly the same configuration.
It is worth appreciating that fixing a port speed and duplex on one side, while leaving the device at the other end of the cable in auto-configuration mode is a really bad idea. This frequently results in the auto-configured end managing to auto-configure to the wrong duplex setting.
The wrong duplex setting means that one end is running on 'half' duplex and the other on 'full' duplex mode. This causes all sorts of performance issues, which worsen rapidly with increasing data flow and with applications that move data in both directions on a cable at once.
They often manifest as a connection that seems to work fine at very low utilisations, but that turns to mush when high capacity data transfers are attempted on the line.
The rule is: Both ends of a cable must be set to auto, or both ends must be set manually (and to the same configuration!). Anything else is inviting problems.
Some power adaptors for ADSL2+ routers are, bluntly, cheap and nasty.
In particular, they can be badly regulated, resulting in the output voltage being too high or too low or varying over time.
Even more importantly, these power adaptors may suffer from voltage drops during brief voltage drops in the incoming 240V power supply to your premises, or in response to other devices on the same circuit drawing a large surge of power from the line.
Better quality power supplies contain enough circuitry to be able to 'ride out' brief drops in the incoming power quality.
The best approach here is to buy and install a UPS (un-interruptable power supply) unit and to plug your router into it.
While you are at it, putting in one that is large enough to run your computer from as well is also a great idea (and may stop that mysterious intermittent crashing problem you have at the same time - this is the cause of a lot more unexplained crashes in computers than you may expect).
Not only will the use of a UPS eliminate this potential source of line dropouts (which is a surprisingly common cause), but it means that if you are using a laptop for Internet access, the combination of the built in battery in the laptop, plus the UPS powering the router, will provide you with Internet access during a power failure.
Using the UPS to also power the base station of your cordless phone will provide you with the benefit of continuous phone service during a power outage as well.
Note that some sources of voltage drops can be very local (e.g., large household appliances on the same circuit, such as air-conditioners and fridges). Others can be remote (e.g., the next door neighbour's high powered electric welder).
A UPS usually overcomes all of these factors and provides additional benefits. It is cheap insurance in a number of regards.
Sometimes people observe that the ADSL line speed looks great, and downloads from 'nearby' or 'local' servers (such as mirror servers provided by Internode) work well, but download speeds from distant (overseas) sites are far slower.
This is a common problem for many computer operating systems made in Redmond, Washington, USA (and some others).
If you are running Windows, in particular, if you see this effect, and if you haven't yet tuned your TCP/IP stack (Google for 'Dr TCP' and/or for 'tuning TCP window size') - it is worth trying this.
This 'TCP Window Size' issue is something you can prove pretty easily. It is almost always a problem if you observe that one download from a well connected, but internationally distant, server is slow, but that two or more downloads from that location at once all run at that same speed - meaning that you can generate an aggregate download speed that 'fills' your connection if you do multiple downloads at once.
The use of Wi-Fi, while very convenient for many people, also introduces a potential source of slowdowns, packet loss, and similar problems:
The wireless standards that have the greatest potential for these problems happening are those that work in the '2.4 Gigahertz' spectrum range (such as the original 802.11b Wi-Fi standard. and the very popular 802.11g standard).
The simplest way to prove whether your Wi-Fi is a factor in reducing performance is to bypass it - plug your computer into a direct Ethernet port and compare the performance outcome compared to using Wi-Fi. If your performance gets a lot better - then you've found your performance bottleneck and you can either accept that bottleneck or change your Wi-Fi configuration to overcome it.
The very latest versions of Wi-Fi (802.11n) offer very substantial improvements in speed, range and reliability and are well worth considering if you need to rely upon wireless access from your computer(s). Note that 802.11n can of course only work if both your base station and your end-point computers all run it. Otherwise it will 'step down' to an older 802.11 standard that runs at a lower speed.
Bluetooth is another wireless technology that operates in the same 2.4 GHz frequency range. If you are using Bluetooth and a 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi network, try turning Bluetooth off to see if your broadband performance improves. Despite most Bluetooth and Wi-Fi services coexisting fairly well, some combinations of Bluetooth and Wi-Fi services do severely interfere with each other.
The simplest workaround if you want to keep using Bluetooth in use and you see Wi-Fi interference is to change over your Wi-Fi network to one that operates in a band other than 2.4 GHz.
Similarly to the Bluetooth scenario, many popular cordless phones run in the 2.4 GHz wireless band and these can conflict with Wi-Fi access, resulting in lower broadband performance and/or in problems with using the cordless phones.
One solution is to move to cordless phones running in a different band (e.g. DECT phones or otherwise). Alternatively, you may be able to adjust the channels that are used by the Wi-Fi and the phone, to ensure maximum separation. Finally, you could investigate setting up a Wi-Fi network in a frequency other than 2.4 GHz, for example 5 GHz.
If working through this list doesn't resolve your ADSL2+ speed issues, and you strongly believe that your performance should be higher at your current location, please contact the Internode helpdesk.
Start off by indicating that you have worked through this entire list and tried everything in it - and be prepared to confirm the results of your isolation testing, and to indicate whether you have had your premises wiring checked and/or a central splitter professionally installed by a licensed cabler, as this information will help the support person to provide the best results for you.
Ultimately, the optimisation of ADSL2+ line sync speed is a trade-off - between how much time and money you are prepared to spend on it, versus the benefits in your own mind of that expenditure, should it improve your line speed or connection reliability.
For some people, stability without all this effort is more important than absolute speed - and for those people, the pragmatic answer is to use the Internode ADSL2+ Profile Changer to select a progressively higher reliability (and hence lower speed) connection profile until an acceptable compromise is reached in terms of connection stability.
If that stability comes at the price of a large drop in connection speed and this drop is too large to ignore - well, that's what this list is for! In most cases, you can improve your performance by working carefully through this checklist and implementing those steps that apply to your situation.
Once you have done so, it is possible that you can then select a higher performance profile in the Internode ADSL2+ profile changer again, and convert your increased stability back into higher speed without a drop in that stability - a win-win.
This is (of course) the primary determinant of attenuation on a line. The physics at play here - as per the performance graph we saw earlier - lead to the simple result that the longer the copper line, the lower the maximum possible speed becomes.
In a little more detail, what happens here is that the longer the line, the lower the maximum usable frequency becomes on the line. ADSL works by splitting the line up into chunks of spectrum (frequencies), and in each of these 'buckets' a 64 kilobit per second path is attempted by the ADSL chips at each end of the line. As line length gets greater, the frequency at which these buckets just don't work gets lower and lower. This 'roll off' removes buckets from being viable and as each one is deemed un-viable, there goes another 64 kilobits of line speed.
This can come from surprising sources - not just sources local to your house, but also from things as direct as a high powered AM Radio transmitter that is near to your copper line somewhere on its path back to your local exchange.
These interference sources can knock out a cluster of 'buckets' from being able to work at all - meaning that despite the downstream attenuation figure implying a given speed, the real world maximum speed may be quite a lot lower.
As indicated already, ADSL2+ does the best it can with what it is presented with in terms of spectrum that it can use on the line. But sometimes, these factors can remove substantial parts of that spectrum from play.
Sometimes external interference of this sort can be reduced by trying different ADSL2+ line profiles and/or by the installation of appropriate Radio Frequency 'chokes' on the incoming phone line cable.
This is a medium to long term factor that will ultimately become a significant cause of reduced performance in high density service areas that wind up with a lot of copper based xDSL services running in the same cable bundle in the street.
This factor is the main reason why the theoretical maximum speed graph we presented earlier is expected to become harder and harder to attain in practice, in higher density, higher take-up areas. In such high density-of-takeup areas, and on a progressively downward basis, everyone starts to slow everyone else down.
A bridge tap is created when your line had a previous history in serving another premises, and as a result, there is a run of cable (sometimes quite a long run) that runs as a 'spur' from a Telstra jointing pit or jointing mushroom, off toward the previous end point of your line.
Each bridge tap creates what amounts to a tuned antenna, and this has the effect of rendering one part of the overall ADSL2+ spectrum unavailable to your router to use. The more bridge taps on your line, the more chunks of ADSL2+ spectrum become unusable, and each of these costs you some line speed.
Bridge taps are an instance of a factor that can lower the available line speed even when the line 'attenuation' figures rendered by your modem suggest that a higher speed should be possible. The attenuation figure rendered by your modem is a single axis measurement of a wide spectrum service. Reality, as always, is a lot more complex than any single number can measure.
A lot of old Telstra cables suffer from water ingress into joints/pits during serious rain. Had any rain of late?
Many old cables are aerial and hence are vulnerable to being put under mechanical stress by high winds - had any of that lately?
Unfortunately, it can be very hard to get Telstra to fix copper line faults which are intermittent, via your ADSL provider - Telstra simply have no incentive to do so, financial or otherwise, and indeed some serious incentives to ignore your provider when we report such faults.
However, they do to take notice of audible faults reported in a retail voice (PSTN) service.
So your best bet, if you happen to have increased/noticeable ADSL problems and you also notice that you also have audio quality problems with phone calls (crackly line, lower than normal voice amplitude etc) is to report the fault as a voice quality problem to your phone provider.
If you can hear voice faults (low volume level, crackling, intermittent sound) - call your voice provider (immediately, before the fault disappears when the weather changes again).
Usually the 'fix' (if one is performed) involves repairing or replacing cable joints or segments of the overall line path that have either suffered from mechanical or chemical stress, or that have insulation flaws allowing the ingress of water in to the joint concerned.